Articoli di Psicoterapia Integrativa
Tedesco
Inglese
Spagnolo
Francese
Italiano
Portoghese
RussoDIVERSITY, UNITY AND RELATIONSHIP:
INTERPERSONAL
DYNAMICS OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
By
Richard G Erskine, Ph.D.
The purpose of this talk is to re-emphasise the inter-personal dynamics
of social psychology and apply the theme of this conference diversity,
unity, and relationship to family relations, social systems, and organisations;
to education, psychotherapy, and counselling.
"I'm OK, you're OK" is a basic tenet of Transactional Analysis.
But, how can I be OK with you if I'm so different from you? What
if I speak differently? What
if I act unpredictably for you? What
if I have different values? Can I still be OK with you? And can you still
be OK with me, because of this diversity?
Much of the political conflict in this world indicates that people have
a great deal of difficulty with diversity. Diversity is disturbing. People
who are different may seem inconsistent, unreliable, and untrustable. Other
people's strange ways may be interpreted by us to mean that they are lazy,
crazy, stupid, bad or wrong. These misperceptions occur because of incomplete
perceptions! We don't really know the experience of that other person so
we complete the Gestalt with some aspect of our past experience; we fill
in how we understand the other person with our own fear; we interpret their
behaviour with our own unconscious projection. And
hence, we make an image of the other person's differences. According
to Martin Buber, we sometimes create other people as an "it" instead
of seeing the sacred or the "thou"
inherent in their being. Such
incomplete and misinformed perceptions always lack empathy. We
fail to place the other person's behaviour within a realm of his or her unique
sensitivities or relational needs and therefore become both inter-personally
and intra-personally alienated.
Because of a human hunger for relationship we seek unity. How
do we become united in relationships if we are so unique, different and
diverse? The integration of
a relational perspective of psychotherapy and social psychology concepts
may provide challenging answers to these questions.
Unity
requires a genuine interest in the other person, an interest that leads
us to an inquiry; an inquiry of his or her phenomenological experience;
that is, the subjective way each and every one of us processes interpersonal
transactions and makes different meanings often of the same experience. We
emerge with different values about the same event. A
genuine inquiry, if it is going to be effective in knowing the other, always
begins with the assumption, "I know nothing about the other's experience:
my perceptions, my interpretation, my meanings are incomplete."
Therefore,
I must know you by inquiry: who you are, what you value, how you understand
what is happening, what you feel. If
I don't inquire, I know nothing except my interpretation of you. We
just stay separate. One of
us must bridge that gap of separateness. Inquiry
is part of the process. But
it's difficult to withstand the uncertainty, the anxiety of getting to
know each other, crossing that barrier of our own interpretation, history
and fears. Because if we really inquire and attempt to know others in some
fundamental way, if we learn their perspectives, their uniqueness and their
differences, their diversity will challenge and perhaps change us. To be
changed by knowing the other may be anxiety making. So
a genuine interest in diversity requires a willingness to tolerate anxiety,
to be disturbed, be impacted by the other, to be moved, to be changed.
When open to diversity and valuing the other's uniqueness, even brief transactions
may have a growth-enhancing effect.
I'll illustrate with an experience that Rebecca and I had in Lao. We were
in the airport in Vientiane, which consisted of a little two-story concrete
building. We were in the closed
waiting room on the top floor with a flat roof, and no windows that opened. The
lack of air circulation was stifling. The
Laotians sat patiently; the Westerners got agitated and complained. It
was a long, hot day. After
yet another announcement that the flight would be delayed, an old Laotian
man, sitting next to Rebecca, shrugged and said, "Life is long." What? I
was astonished. I thought, "life
is short." "Life
is long," says a man who lived in underground tunnels for nine years
of relentless bombing. The
story of this old man, who had lived through revolution, starvation, and
war, had a profound impact on us. Since
that encounter I've continually wondered what would happen if I adopted
the idea that "life is long?" To
see this world through the perspective of another is a challenging and
sometimes difficult task, a disruption of our psychological homeostasis. Our
sense of predictability gets shaken. Our identity is under fire. Our
sense of being special, our ego-centred perspective is challenged. When
we allow the other person to impact us, it changes our mental structures. To
view life as long rather than short profoundly changes one's perspective
events take on a new meaning.
The appreciation of diversity, then, is based on a willingness to be open
to the other and an inquiry into the other's subjective experience and
how he or she constructs meaning. The
appreciation of diversity is our respecting the integrity of the other
person: respecting his or her integrity even if we don't understand them. When
we don't understand the other person, it is hard to appreciate their integrity,
to discover their uniqueness, to inquire about their meaning and their
purpose. Respecting the integrity
of the other is emphasised in the Hindi greeting "Namaste"
which loosely translated means, "the God in me greets the God in you".
I have tried, not always with ease, to put into practice a story which
influenced me when I was twelve or thirteen years old. We
used to have a Sunday evening radio program called "The Inner Sanctum". It
was a half-hour show consisting of two fifteen-minute stories. These
were intriguing and sometimes scary short stories about the supernatural. But
since this was just before Christmas the program had a more Christmas-oriented,
less scary tone. On this particular
December evening the story was about a twelve-year-old boy who had gone
shopping to buy his mother a Christmas present. He
had found just what he was looking for. It
hadn't cost quite as much as he expected. He
had some money left over and was planning to buy something for himself. He
was standing at the bus stop in the snow with many other people. An
old homeless man was asking if somebody would buy him a bus ticket. Evening
was falling, the snow was coming down, it was getting colder and the old
homeless man wanted to get on the bus so that he could be warm and sleep
on the bus all night. All
of the grown-ups turned away. They
ignored him. The little boy
had a dilemma: to buy himself a toy or to buy the old street person a ticket. All the people filed onto the bus. He bought the old man a ticket. The
little boy got on the bus and went to the back. The
old homeless man got on. As
he walked down the corridor of the bus, he looked at each person, greeted
him or her, and blessed each one. As
he got to the little boy he said, "God is with you" and proceeded
to walk to the back of the bus, faded right through the superstructure
of the bus, and disappeared. The
boy was awe-struck. As the
bus passed a church, he saw a manger scene where the boy's image of the
old homeless man merged with the statue of the baby Jesus. When
he arrived home he asked his mother, "Mom, I have a question: is Christ
a baby at Christmas, or can he be an old man on the bus?"
Who is your client? Who is
your student? Who is your
colleague? Can they be as
sacred as the story of the old man implies? This
story speaks of a sense of "You're OK with me no matter what your
diversity."
What if we encounter our diversity, our differences, and even our adversary
with the same sense of sacredness that that little boy learned from the
old man on the night before Christmas? Unity
and relationship require honouring the uniqueness and diversity of the
other person. We must work
at knowing them. That takes
time. It takes suspending
our judgement. Metaphorically
it's like we've got to get into another's skin, to vicariously experience
her world the way she hears and sees it. The
psychological task of relatedness includes knowing and valuing the other's
perspective and at the same time not wholly surrendering our own uniqueness,
both staying with our own perspective while allowing it to be changed.
By opening ourselves to knowing the other we create a new synthesis of
our self through relationship.
Unity requires presence. That
sense of de-centring from myself, making my own wishes, needs, even my
theories, unimportant and, for the time being, focusing entirely on the
other's experience. Presence also includes the capacity to shuttle back
to our own experience childhood memories, our parental influences, our
training, things that enrich our lives--and to use those experiences as
a vast resource library to the interchange. To
be both de-centred and yet stimulated, to bring the richness of our life
history to the other is the personal presence that facilitates relationship.
Richard G Erskine, Ph.D.
Institute for Integrative Psychotherapy, New York, NY
University of Derby, UK
__________
This article was originally published in ITA News, Number 54, Summer 1999, pp. 17-18.